If you are choosing an ERP in the UAE you are probably weighing a global
product against a local one. Both are legitimate choices. Here is an honest view of the
trade-off, including where we are the wrong answer.
Feature lists look similar. The difference that shows up eighteen months in is what happens
when the system will not do something you need.
| Global product SAP, Microsoft Dynamics, Odoo, Zoho, QuickBooks, Tally |
Sherta | |
|---|---|---|
| Who wrote it | A vendor overseas | Us, in Abu Dhabi |
| Who implements it | Usually a local partner | Us |
| Custom change | Partner raises it with the vendor; may become a paid module or never arrive | We change the code |
| Support | Tiered; first line often overseas | The people who built it, UAE hours |
| UAE specifics | WPS, gratuity and e-invoicing usually via localisation packs or add-ons | Built in, because our customers are here |
| Ecosystem | Large; many consultants and add-ons | Small; we are the ecosystem |
| If you outgrow the UAE | Scales globally | We would not pretend otherwise |
“Does the CRM post to the general ledger, or do we export and import?”
Many suites are assembled from separate products — a CRM here, a payroll tool there,
accounting underneath — joined by connectors. They work, but each join is a place where
numbers drift and someone reconciles at month-end.
In Sherta the modules are one system with full integration to the GL: a
quotation becomes an order, the order is invoiced, and revenue, VAT and the receivable post
themselves. Payroll, stock movements, depreciation, IFRS 16 amortisation and inter-company
recharges do the same. Ask any vendor to show you that chain end to end, with your numbers.
We would rather say this now than after an implementation:
We regularly migrate businesses from Tally, QuickBooks, Zoho Books, Odoo, older accounting
packages and — most commonly — a long-serving set of spreadsheets. The work is in
reconciling, not copying: your opening balances must match what you left, and you must be able
to prove it.